All posts by marvk24

communist

An Icy Tale

Against my best wishes and tightly straightened limbs, my body rattled in protest to the wintry ice of Ireland. It was quite embarrassing, truly, even if I had no witnesses to my ailment. I would not accept that my body could be weaker than my will.

I stood in the lonely churchyard, the only thing audible beside my huffed breaths the whisper of the wind and the soft sigh of snow. It may seem nonsensical that I was here, chattering away in the cold. Unfortunately for the other guests as well as myself, the electricity at the Gresham had gone out. I must say that despite my departure from the butler role, I was quite embarrassed for the workers in the hotel. I mean no insult to their honor or dignity, but shouldn’t the staff of the grandest hotel in Dublin be able to fix a problem as simple as this? Perhaps a new staff plan would be wise. 

I laughed at my foolishness. Had I learned nothing since that fateful day on the Weymouth Pier? Why, of course not– and how do I know? Well, in my meandering from the Gresham to this desolate place, I had most horrifically damaged the once-pristine cuffs of my trousers. I was certain in my changed person for the fact that I did not care one bit about the mess.

My limbs suddenly rattled rather fervently, returning my mind to the present. The snow had become increasingly cruel as the powder– thick yet light like dust I may have once dusted from portraits in a library– fell in torrents around me. My eyes became focused on the crooked grave before me– a simple, wooden cross that had long before begun to rot. I squinted at the faded text etched into the wood, which read Michael Furey. My mind wandered for a length of time– the type of wandering that leaves one with no memory of their existence for those moments– before I was abruptly startled. It was not the cold this time but rather a deep voice that crackled over a particularly strong gust of wind. 

“I beg your pardon, good sir. Perhaps you’re wondering what brings me here to this desolate spot on such a day as this,” said the stranger. The voice came from my right, and I flinched slightly to find the black-clad figure barely a few centimeters away. He did not look at me and remained steadily staring at the grave. “But our meeting here is fortuitous, perhaps, for I see that we are in similar frames of mind. I’m Gabriel Conroy.”

I turned my head ever so slightly in an attempt to catch a glimpse of Mr. Conroy’s face, but the darkness of the late day and blur of snow against his cloak kept him shrouded from my sight. I did not really know what to think of the stranger, or how to converse with him– did he expect one of those clever witticisms as some gentlemen often do? Surely not– the tone of his voice was rather grave– and if anyone could know that, it would be myself. 

Realizing the awkward silence, I decided to address him. “Most warm greetings, Mr. Conroy. I am Mr. Stevens.” I stuck out my hand, trembling slightly from the cold, to shake his. He turned his body towards me and shook my hand in a tight grip. Looking up, I finally caught a glimpse of his face and swallowed a reaction at what I witnessed. I saw a man haunted by his past as I was by mine. His skin was gray with cold or grief– I did not know.

“Oh, please, call me Gabriel,” he said as he returned his hand to his side. I smiled before protesting. “Sir, truly, I could–” 

“Please, Mr. Stevens. I have not heard the timbre of my name in quite some time.”

I smiled again, sliding my cold hands in my pockets as I did so. “Gabriel, then. A pleasure to meet you.”

He cocked his head. “I notice a different accent. Where are you from?”

“Oh, an old house near Oxfordshire. In England,” I clarified. “I was in service at Darlington Hall. Perhaps you’ve heard of it.”

Gabriel seemed to ponder for a moment, his brow furrowed, before answering. “Yes, I used to be very interested in English affairs, despite my roots here in Ireland. People didn’t like me so much for it,” he chuckled. Did I hear a note of sadness there?

“Ah. I’m sure you had your reasons,” I remarked, not so sure of what else to say. Besides, I had been slightly busy puzzling over what the stranger meant by thinking us ‘in similar frames of mind.’ 

Gabriel suddenly turned towards my person, though I noticed he hesitated before turning his lingering gaze away from the grave before us. 

“Mr. Stevens. You seem an observant man, so I know you must wonder what I meant earlier when I said we are in similar states of mind. I know it is frigid out here and you likely have other things to tend to. But I wish to tell you a tale.” 

And a tale he did tell.

I do not plan to summarize or retell Mr. Conroy’s story because I believe it is his to tell. But I have my thoughts, and they all truly come down to one conclusion: that to look at Gabriel Conroy is to look into a mirror. It almost made me laugh. What suppressed, rotten fools we were! Breaking the spirits of those we loved only because we could not face the music. Music, yes– a highlight of Gabriel’s story. If my memory abandoned me I am confident that two things would never evade me– unless the correct description is I evading them: Miss Kenton’s face at our sorrowful goodbye and the vision of Gabriel’s wife standing, a statue in the shadows, as she heard the melody of her buried past. Buried indeed, I thought as I occasionally glanced at the poor little Michael Furey’s grave. 

It was comical how parts of Gabriel’s story brought forth bouts of rage in me that were impossible to quell. How tragically hilarious for me to find Mr. Conroy ridiculous for his loss while I was equally if not more ridiculous for mine. More ridiculous, certainly.

Mr. Conroy was quite the spectacular storyteller, though, and I found myself forgetting the knock of the cold and swirl of the wind. When he finished his tale, I found us no longer strangers but brothers– bound not by blood but instead horrific losses of our own doing.

Suppressed no more, I shuffled my frozen limbs to Gabriel as I embraced him tightly. He did not hesitate before reciprocating– a lesson we had both learned well before.

“Let’s get back to the Gresham, shall we?” I asked before offering him my arm. He chuckled his assent before we began trotting– hopefully– to the warmth and light of the hotel.

“Wait, Mr. Stevens,” Gabriel halted suddenly, turning around and walking back to the grave. He waved me over with his hand. “Assist me.”

In a joint effort, Gabriel Conroy and I straightened Michael Furey’s previously crooked cross, and for a moment the wind was still.

Paralysis in James Joyce’s “The Sisters”

In an interview conducted in 1906, James Joyce said, “‘I left the Catholic Church, hating it most fervently. I found it impossible for me to remain in it on account of the impulses of my nature…Now I make war upon it by what I write and say and do. I cannot enter the social order except as a vagabond.’” 

In commentary to Joyce’s quote, a scholar from the University of Chicago wrote, “Joyce’s early critique of the Church was…illustrated by [his] ascription of ‘paralysis’ to an Irish culture and society permeated by Catholicism” (Kanter 381). 

James Joyce’s Dubliners is a collection of short stories that share a common thread: paralysis. I personally am quite attached to Joyce’s work because of this reappearing idea for reasons I cannot exactly explain. The human draw to that which is sinister, perhaps? I am specifically attracted to “The Sisters” for reasons unknown as well other than the fact that I found it a slightly creepy yet interesting tale. I also must say that I wonder at Joyce’s title choice for this story, as the sisters were not at all the primary focus of the text. I honestly love James Joyce for this seeming randomness- I can’t predict what’s going to happen next, and nothing is ever so obvious as it seems when he’s writing the story. He reminds me of Dante in that regard, only Dante was never random and used every possible detail to prove his points in the story.

Paralysis in “The Sisters,” at least in comparison to some other stories, is more obviously physical. 

Brief pause, I just found out that my cat is going to be put down tomorrow. The rest of this may not be so coherent as previous writing. 

The paralysis in this short story is more clearly, and essentially stated literally. The protagonist’s mentor (if the protagonist was ever named, I could not remember it) is Father Flynn, a leader in the Catholic Church that has unfortunately suffered a third stroke, leaving him immobile. This is a critical point made by Joyce through his own unique style; I believe that he is stating or indicating a paralyzed nature of society most specifically within the church. I cannot say I came up with this idea on my own, because who am I kidding – Joyce’s writing has so much embedded within it that I, with my redundant brain in comparison to his, understand it in its full glory. I was only given this idea from the lovely scholar I mention previously at the University of Chicago (Em, if you’re reading this, I hope to read a scholarly article from you during your time at the school). According to Kanter, Joyce ‘ascripts’ paralysis to the Irish culture and the Catholic Church. I personally cannot speak on his commentary on Irish culture, as I am not exactly super knowledgeable in that regard (if only I had Grace here) but I do want to discuss the church. I speak on this purely in a general religious sense, not in a Catholic sense, as I am not Catholic and know nothing of the sort. I think Joyce was really onto something here in discussing the church as being in paralysis through his use of his Father Flynn character. 

Paralysis…being stuck…frozen. Do teachings in church, especially in those which are corrupt, hold us in place? Are the corrupt ideologies so many believe confining? Joyce would say yes. And this is what he is talking about in this short story. The young narrator spends all of his time with Father Flynn as he admires and tries to learn his way of life from him. He is very openly criticized by the lovely old Cotter and is encouraged to act more like other kids, who live more lightheartedly. I don’t sense any judgment or distaste for the narrator throughout the story, but perhaps Joyce is watching him spin his own demise as he lives in proximity with the corrupt figurehead of paralysis.

Another side note- the narrator is said to make the ‘snuff’ ready for Father Flynn, who physically cannot do it himself, but I see another meaning to this. The church, so often praising themselves for doing only the good and the clean, most often get their hands dirty under the table. Was this perhaps symbolism for corrupted people not necessarily wanting to get their own hands dirty and preferring to subject an innocent to doing it for them? Interesting things to think about.

Anyway, I love James Joyce and his writing. My highest compliment ever received is having my own writing compared to his (thank you Mr. Nigro) and I will never forget it. If I could choose anyone dead or alive to have lunch with, James is an honest contender with beloved Dante. I would love to see what goes on in his silly little head.

I leave you now to eat a tub of ice cream in my bed. Good night.

God is a communist.

Note to readers: This is a Marv post – redux, published by me for your edification. I don’t know if God is a communist, but he is definitely a bald man with a beard 😂) – Mr. N

God, Karl Marx- what’s the difference, really? I’m here to be an annoying, filthy little commie as usual, but I also have some deeper thoughts to express.

I really connected with Marji’s depiction of her relationship with God in Persepolis. Not necessarily with the physical depiction of God, although the resemblance to Karl Marx was hilarious, as I don’t really have a picture of what God looks like in my head. My former relationship with God resembles exactly that of Marji’s- I talked to God like they were my best friend. I prayed, but more often you would find me fully doing mundane tasks as I mentally conversed with God. This was my relationship with God when I was a Christian, although the ‘category’ of religion that I fell under didn’t matter to me at all.

My relationship with God is broken, and I haven’t uttered much of anything to God in years, unless you count short prayers for my friends. I felt connected to Marji in her childhood fury at God. Human atrocities hurt Marji’s religious relationship. Similarly, I blamed God for not loving me because of the perspective of other hateful people- AKA human atrocities.

A quick break for a brief apology: this blog post is becoming more of a rant about my own issues than I intended it to. Oops.

I think I love Persepolis so much because I see myself in Marji- and rather than hating her, as I do myself, I love her. I have compassion for her. I see that it was not her fault.

I also love this book because Marji’s depiction and relationship with God eased something deep down for me. Seeing her and the Karl Marx resembling God healed something for me. It reminded me of who God truly is- not the hateful, damning force that people paint them to be.  Also- God is just. A communist. God is our OG comrade. Marx’s manifesto says, in general, everything that God stands for.

Unfortunately, I most often still think that God hates me.

Marji, Marv, and Karl Marxy God

Welcome to the show! It’s…

Marv’s religious trauma.

I personally really connected with Marji’s relationship with God in this book. This is an interesting topic for me as a former Christian turned into whatever the heck I am now. Future Judaism convert? Agnostic little gremlin? At least the communist part remains consistent.

Marji and I, at least when I was Christian- spoke to God very similarly. I didn’t really pray, per se, but rather conversed with Them as I would a normal human being. I would go around, doing my silly little tasks, and just talk. I would do it for hours on end sometimes; I would rant and process and just fully project all my thoughts and feelings to God. Marji reminds me of myself in that regard as she depicts God as a physical human being in her book.

I never had a mental picture of what God looked like, but if I did, I hope this would be it.

I have deep, irrevocable religious trauma. It will never be undone. I will never fully be healed. This is not sad to me- not anymore, at least, which shows me that some healing has been done and is possible. But the scars will always be there.

That being said, I am grateful to Marji and the piece of herself she shared in the childhood era of Persepolis. I looked to her with so much love as she navigated her fucked up world with God by her side, and my love for her persisted when she pushed God away in anger. Somewhere deep down was healed slightly by this because I did the exact same thing. And if I can love Marji and not blame her for it, how can I logically hate myself for the same action? The answer is that I can’t. And yet the self-hatred is not logical, and it will persist.

I still, at least half the time, believe that God hates me- not only for turning away from Him in my fury-woven sorrow, but for being me. For hating the Christian institution. For being queer. For being mentally ill. For being strong-minded. For finally, for once in my life, starting to say what I think. For questioning. For having true hatred for other people. For wanting revenge. For wanting those who hurt others to suffer tenfold. For what I eat. For who I love. For being a leftist- a communist. For being angry.  For writing the very criticism I am writing at this moment.

Marji reminded me, at least a little bit, that God is not this cruel, hypocritical, hateful person I think of Them as. Marji made her God a straight-haired version of Karl Marx. He was gentle, he was thoughtful, he was peaceful, he was accepting, he was loving. He was what I used to believe God was. He was what I desperately wish I could believe God is.

I would give anything to have the childlike innocence I had before. I blamed God for hating me, for being cruel, for leaving me. I know now that it was truly the fault of false, evil Christians that led me astray. But I will never forget what they said, or what they did, or how they made me feel. I will never love myself in full because there will always be a part of me that believes my own Creator hates me.

I wish I could love myself. I wish God could too.

What did I just read???

This will be a blog post in true ‘blog’ form- all of my raw thoughts on this book will be shared. Please expect less intelligent commentary from Marv here.

First of all, I loved this book. There’s SO much going on in so little pages. Marquez runs through many themes in this little text: the double standard cult of virginity, the hidden power of women in society, racial prejudice, classist bias, and the faulty nature of memories in our human minds while we have preconceived notions of people, places, and events.

Aside from there being a thousand characters in CDF, I felt as though the reading was easy to understand. Atonement, in my opinion, was exponentially more challenging to read. The themes here felt more obvious, the language simpler, the characters easier to read. I would not say that this book is any way ‘simple’, however. I am intensely impressed by how much is packed into this mini little literary work of genius.

As far as characters go, my opinions are pretty simple. I love Angela with my whole heart. My heart breaks for the abuse she received from her mother throughout her life. I wish I knew what the truth was regarding who took her virginity, but I respect her iron-clad secret. Santiago Nasar, on the other hand, is an absolute asshat. He continually assaulted Victoria Guzman’s daughter, Divina Flor, and was overall a menace to society. He was rich, too, of course, and as we all know, Marv does not favor such people. I have mixed feelings on Bayardo, honestly. He came out of nowhere and pointed to a woman to be his wife like a customer might point to an item they want to purchase. I am not surprised at this behavior, as it is the norm in this society. I remain to be disappointed, though. We also know absolutely nothing about him as a person, and although he proved to be seemingly harmless, who was he really?

As for the twins, I found them rather comical. My dislike of Nasar makes for a rather twisted approval of their actions, but can anyone blame them fully for the murder anyway? I feel sorry for the twins in a weird way. They went around and told quite literally everyone (minus Santiago Nasar) about their plans to kill him for their sister (Angela’s) honor. No one stopped them. The whole town is equally, in my perspective, guilty for Santiago Nasar’s violent death. Good for them, though- he wasn’t all that great.

This book is definitely re-read worthy. I could easily read this entire book within an hour if I had the time. The comedy and drama of it all makes for a fun read. The only thing I hate about this book is its ending. I’m not a big fan of hanging plot endings, so this book slightly killed my soul with that. I need closure, bro. But ANYWAY. Great book. I hope you keep teaching it or at least peer pressure and harass your student to read this. Excited for Persepolis!

Briony Tallis: Inferno, Purgatorio, or Paradiso?

Yes, Marv has returned to discuss Dante’s work again. Yes, I do have an obsession. Yes, this will be a Briony Tallis blog with some light slander.

Briony Tallis interests me because of the mind-bending ethical philosophy arguments and questions she brings about. I navigate the world through a lens of strict ethical and moral codes, therefore making the philosophical conflict in this text all-consuming for me.

Can we truly atone in the same lifetime that we committed countless sins? Or is the only place for humans to truly face accountability a place that only exists beyond the veil of death? What sins do we pay eternity for, and what sins are paid with a brief time in brimstone?

I find myself confounded by the question of not only whether or not Briony Tallis was able to atone during her lifetime, but if she would ever be able to after death. Would Briony go to Inferno, where the 9 circles of hell torment your soul mercilessly for all of time? Or Purgatorio, where she suffers until the suffering she caused tipped the scale of sins to equivalence? Or did she fully atone during her life by working in the war and then fully publicizing all of her evils, no forgiveness asked, and rise to the peace of Paradiso?

I truly wish I could answer this question, especially because I dislike Briony so much. However, I know it would not be genuine if I said the solution was easy and bid her goodbye into Satan’s torturous realm. On one hand, Briony was indirectly (or, arguably, directly) responsible for the deaths of Cecilia and Robbie, directly responsible for their years of anguish, and opened the door of opportunity for Marshall to marry Lola Quincey. The youngest Tallis sister tore lives apart with her desire to exist as the valiant savior, the martyred daughter, the overlooked sister.

However, Briony became fully aware of all she did and then threw away her place at Girton in leu of working in the war and then writing, in full, the sins she committed in her self-serving nature. Her novel not only gave away her atrocities but carried the honor of those she brought harm to: Robbie and Cecilia.

I am not, in any way, commending Briony for these actions in an attempt at atonement. Her lifelong suffering, from my perspective, was the minimum punishment that she deserved in life. And while I am not confident in the question of where she would fall in the afterlife following her attempts at atoning, I am fully sure that she would deserve the worst of Inferno had she not chosen to give up her alternate, ‘normal’ life as a scholar after taking that very choice away from Robbie.

I am a major Briony hater, to be clear. I do not believe that her lifetime of suffering because of her grave actions earned her any forgiveness from anyone – Robbie, Cecilia, the reader. But Briony also never asked nor expected anyone’s forgiveness, and for that, I find that there would be mercy for her somewhere.

Writing this blog post has been quite therapeutic for me, as I feel as though I have been able to objectively (as possible) gather my final thoughts on Briony. Surprisingly, and slightly frustratingly, my evaluation of her is not so harsh as I once believed.